6
Surprise…Surprise!
|
Smith climbing into AST for record zoom. |
The Air Force test program began as I started
flying the aircraft from the factory to
Edwards. I would perform another zoom flight
test each time I picked up one of the aircraft
to move from Palmdale to Edwards, which began
our full qualification of the AST for its
primary role as a space-plane trainer. The
flight depended on the “experience” of the
particular aircraft. When I flew out #756 in
that manner, I was able to fly its first zoom,
since it already had 18 test flights when I took
off. I got it to somewhere around a peak
altitude of 118 to 119 thousand feet, the
typical range of my zooms.
Wind, temperature and density at altitude had
impact on the zoom performance, but we had no
data to consider these. Some were later
developed for ARPS use, however, not on max
zooms. The apogee on this flight was around my
average, so I expected an average reentry. As I
built up speed to nearly Mach 2.2 on the
descending dive an event happened so suddenly
and was so startling that I truly expected that
I had bought the farm. I was at the correct
angle of attack of 16-degrees, so should have
been dynamically stable, but the airplane acted
like it was going unstable. We began a rapid and
harsh yaw cycle that had all the symptoms and in
that split second my heart got close to my
mouth. Maybe it was just the pucker
reverberating from my seat. With dynamic
lateral instability at these conditions an
aircraft becomes uncontrollable with
increasingly wild yaw/roll excursions until it
tears to pieces, in very short order. This is
most apt to happen as the angle of attack and
speed increase and the airplane begins to lose
its margin of directional stability, so we were
dealing in that flight regime and the risk was
present.
There was no reaction possible to reduce speed
at this point in a max zoom, and I had been
aware of that coffin corner. From the top of
the flight, down, the jet and rocket were both
shut off so there was no way to reduce speed
except deploy speed brakes or increase alpha.
Since both of those would increase the risk,
badly, I could only hold on.
The wildly swinging nose continued for a while,
without getting worse, a sure sign it was not a
divergent instability and a great relief. Then
it ceased as quickly as it commenced.
Just as suddenly a second anomaly appeared at a
lower altitude in the dive. One hell of a
rumbling began below and behind me, which
sounded like a serious engine failure, but the
jet had been shutdown at about 86,000 feet on my
way up, a long time before! This too subsided
and the flight was normal thereafter. Lockheed
folks, who were excellent engineers and very
knowledgeable of the airplane concluded that the
reason these occurred this time and not before
was probably the atmospheric differences between
my prior flights, e.g. density, temperature, and
if we were that close to their occurrence then
it would undoubtedly repeat on occasion, and be
very unsettling to students.
Angle
of attack was an unchangeable limit, so I
checked details on the cause and effects, which
restricted me from using speed brakes. The
airplane was redlined to Mach 1.6 in the brakes
open position, but could be raised to 2.0 by
limiting the extension angle of the brakes only
by 2 degrees to 58. We were able to have
small blocks machined and installed to limit the
opening angle. Since I never got above 2.2
in the descent without them, it was clear with
that limit we would never see these problems
again, and I never did.
Similarly, it was concluded that the engine
compartment noise was caused by the lack of
bypass flaps to unload the engine ducts.
Originally all F-104s had these, but they were
deactivated, so we located 3 sets from
deactivated standard F-104s, and our crews
installed and activated them.
The analysis of cause of the ‘false instability’
was suggested to be swallowing of shock waves in
one air intake with resultant unsymmetrical drag
causing yaw, then a spilling effect and reversal
of the process to the other intake. It was
force driven, not instability driven. The
second anomaly was another shock pressure
induced event on the engine compartment.
Neither situation ever reappeared after the two
fixes were completed, even when I flew above
design level.
All of the 38 contractor test flights were
conducted from Palmdale Airport, CA. The only
plan for landing at Edwards was in case of dead
stick landing, which did not occur on any of the
10 zooms between Jack and me. Later on, the
third and final AST (#60762) was completed and I
flew its functional flight test on the way from
the Palmdale, California airport to Edwards
A.F.B., its first flight since the single
production test hop made by Lockheed. Then I
was in full swing on the test program, with all
three airplanes available.
|