Robert A. Rushworth
This autobiographical sketch was compiled as
direct excerpts from a U.S. Air Force Oral
History Interview, dated 14 April 1987, based on
taped answers to question, as stated by Major
General Robert A. Rushworth and edited and
approved for public use by him. This follows
the sequence of his Air Force career.
|
Bob Rushworth and X-15 |
When I was at Hebron (prep school) another
fellow that was going to school with me
suggested that we go down to Portland to the
Army, something or other, and take the aviation
cadet exam—I thought that would be a great
idea—and hopefully get in and beat the draft.
We went down in about April 1943 and took the
exam, and I passed and he failed. I went back
to school and graduated in June. The Monday
after graduation I got my draft notice,
Wednesday I took the physical, and 2 weeks later
I was in the Army the draft, telling them all
along that I had taken the aviation cadet exam
and that I had passed it, but I ended up in Fort
Devens. I guess I only waited about 2 or 3
weeks, and they finally found all the paperwork
and sent me off with a cadre of people from the
east coast to basic training in the aviation
cadet program.
I went to Greensboro for probably a month, and
then I was sent to the University of Toledo for
that college training program. I was supposed
to be there 5 months but ended up there 5
weeks. There was an emergency shipment for
students to go to San Antonio.
I started the aviation cadet program the first
of 1944 and progressed through primary. I went
through the selection process at San Antonio and
then into pr-flight and into primary in Pine
Bluff, Arkansas, then basic in Kansas and
twin-engine advanced in Oklahoma. I graduated
in September and was sent off to a RTU
(replacement training unit) to transition into
C-47’s. My hope was P-38’s since I was in
twin-engine advanced---they were over in
Coffeeville, Kansas, and we could see them
flying all the time. I didn’t get that. I
ended up going to C-47’s and was shipped over to
India. I flew in a C-54 across the ocean into
India and flew out of Ledo for a
while---supplying British troops in Burma and
then into the Assam Valley—and started flying
the “Hump” just before the war ended. Then we
transitioned in C-46’s and flew more hump trips
into Kunming.
I separated from the service in January 1946.
When I was selected to go to the University of
Main--1946—there were so many people going to
school, most of the GIs were sent to a separated
campus down in Brunswick, Maine—abandoned Naval
Air Station. I was there for a year and then
moved up to Orono on the main campus. I got
married between my freshman and sophomore year.
My wife had graduated from nurse’s training, so
she was working and that helped.
That was close to Dow Air Force Base, and – I
decided to become active in the Reserve—they had
a few airplanes, but that didn’t seem to be what
I wanted to do. I got an opportunity to have a
mobilization assignment on the base. About a
year later the Air Force pulled out so I decided
to go over and join the Maine Air National
Guard, who at the time were flying F-80C’s. I
didn’t have any fighter background, but they
said they would take me in and give me some
training and I would ultimately get into flying
the F-80C’s, and I started again flying the T-6,
which I had been flying in the Reserve. I flew
the P-47 and then transitioned into the F-80
about the end of 1949 and that same day was
recalled back into the service for the Korean
War.
|
Major General
Rushworth retirement - AF Museum |
As for going back into the service, it was for a
maximum 21 months, and I figured, well, that
isn’t all that bad. I stayed right there at
Dow, although we did have some TDy’s and
transitioned into the F-86F. About a year
before my tour was up, another fellow and I went
down to Dayton and went over and talked with the
people at the Air Force Institute of Technology
(AFIT) and put in an application to go to
school, and we were both accepted. I took that
realizing that would commit me for 3 years of
active duty after I graduated, but I figured
that wasn’t bad either. It was a good year’s
education, and I could go either way after that.
I left service as a first lieutenant, and when I
got back into the active part of it I missed, I
think, seven times getting promoted to captain
for strange reasons, like ineligible in
mobilization assignments and didn’t get promoted
until 1952 and didn’t get promoted to major
until 1962, and that was with a lot of
contemporaries in that time period.
I went to AFIT and then got assigned as an
engineer working in flight test at
Wright-Patterson and about that time realized
that I had a degree in mechanical engineering,
got another degree in aeronautical engineering,
and had don a lot of flying, and I wanted to put
the two together, the engineering and flying,
somehow. I didn’t know exactly how I was going
to do that. The job I got let me do just
exactly that. I worked on experimental
automatic flight control systems and got to fly
a lot of the brand-new systems that were being
looked at. Some were developed later on, and
some fell by the wayside.
I realized after about 2 more years that I
wasn’t going to go very far in that kind of a
job unless I went to the test pilot school.
They wouldn’t let me transition into some of the
newer airplanes because I hadn’t been to the
school, so I put in to go to that school. About
the only way you could change jobs in that time
period was go to another school, and that became
the first order of business. If you applied for
school and were accepted, it didn’t make any
difference what job you had, you got the
school. I went to the test pilot school in 1956
and graduated in December and went to work at
Edwards in the fighter test organization.
The test plot school was broken down into two
courses, Performance and Stability and Control.
It was a 6-mont course at that time, 3 months in
performance and the other half in stability and
control. I had performance in the classroom, so
that wasn’t any problem. It was just a matter
of applying that to flying and the project that
you do with flying. Stability and Control I had
a little bit but not really enough to satisfy
myself, so that was a good part of the program.
It was more than adequate in order to train me
for later work.
Probably the most important thing you get out of
that is being able to converse with engineers
and designers on how airplanes fly versus what
they look like on the drawing board and what
they look like in the wind tunnel. If one is
good at that kind of a job, he can converse and
make the engineer understand what he doing while
he is flying an airplane.
I think I was very fortunate. I had two or
three engineers, contemporaries, who understood
both what they learned and how to accept what I
was saying and what I learned and what I learned
and accept what they were saying. It worked
very good for me on two or three of the airplane
programs and absolutely outstanding on the X-15
program, working with all of those engineers in
the Air Force and National Aeronautics Advisory
Committee (later designated NASA).
Later on the school went to a year’s program and
added a space effort into their curriculum. The
spoken work was, we were teaching people to be
able to go into the space effort one way or
another. In reality, because there were
probably 15 people in every class and you knew
that they were not all going to be accepted,
most of the people that graduated from those
schools would go back into flight test of
airplanes and more likely become managers on new
space efforts. Some years back they dropped the
space course.
I mentioned that the F-101 had a pitch-up
problem in stability at high angles of attack,
and so did the F-104. The F-101 was a little
safer in that the pilot was able to get into the
pitch-up and get out; whereas with the –104 it
would be unusual: if you got into it and were
able to get out; it’s possible but unusual. As
far as unforgiving, I guess the –101 was a
little more forgiving than the –104.
According to the 1959 Flight Test Center
history, “Captain Iven C. Kincheloe was
originally scheduled to fly the X-15 for the Air
Force, but his untimely death in a crash of an
F-104 on 26 July 1958 moved his alternates,
Major Robert M. White and Captain Robert A.
Rushworth, into pilot and alternate pilot
positions, respectively”.
That accident was probably the most thoroughly
investigated at that time, and there was no
cause ever found as to what happened to the
engine or anything else that might have gone
wrong with the airplane. We suspect that there
was a partial failure in the engine and he was
going to try to land it on Rosamond Lake and
recognized perhaps a little bit too late that
the airplane wasn’t going to glide onto the
surface, so he tried to roll over and eject.
The airplane had a downward ejection seat and he
was pretty low when he tried to roll the
airplane over and eject up and just didn’t allow
enough time and space to do it. His chute
opened and did not blossom before he hit the
ground. It was just waiting too long to get
out.
Had that accident not occurred, I would have
gotten less flights, but I would have had the
opportunity to do the flying. I’m sure Mike
Adams (Maj. Michael J. Adams, who perished in a
X-15 accident) would not have gotten on the
program and perhaps one other either on the NASA
side or the Air Force.
My recollection is that we had the airplane
(X-15) up several times, maybe as many as 8 or
10, before it got launched. I’ sure the first
tow or three flights were planned to be captive
and exercising some of the systems. Where the
smoke came from (on a few captive flights) I
don’t recall, but it wouldn’t have been abnormal
for something to create smoke in the cockpit. I
do recall on perhaps the second or third flight,
one of the primary reasons for the captive
flight would have been to start the auxiliary
power units and test all the systems that drove
and then extend the landing gear to see how that
worked at a particular speed.
We couldn’t have gotten away with not having
chase airplanes. Undoubtedly having them at
launch and at landing saved a number of aborted
flights, a number of probable accidents, and a
number of cases where pilots quickly had to make
a decision on whether to go or not go at launch
or land versus bailout. Chase airplanes in the
flight test business are mandatory, absolutely
under all circumstances unless it’s impossible
to do it.
The number one airplane broke in half around the
3rd or 4th flight. One of
the chambers in one engine exploded and caught
fire, and Scottie (Mr. Scott Crossfield, North
American Aviations, contractor test pilot) shut
it down and headed for landing on Rosamond, (Dry
Lake). The airplane broke from a combination of
things. I think. One, it could not jettison all
of the propellants on board, so the airplane was
a little heavier, and I think the landing gear’s
structure was not completely evaluated and the
design finalized. With the combination of the
two problems, the airplane broke in the weakest
place.
There were changes made in the structure in the
aft section where the landing gear was mounted.
The center section was beefed up. We seemed to
go through a series for a great number of
flights, probably a hundred flights, of seeing
damage either in the land gear area or in the
structural area in the center and depending on
where it was, the structure was beefed up
there. The next time if there was damage seen
in the center section, that was beefed up.
After a period of time, the engineers said,
“Okay, we have done about all we can. The next
time it breaks it’s going to break at the
cockpit, and then you are going to be riding a
chariot down the runway.”
We learned later on in the program, somewhere
around the hundredth flight, certainly half way
through it, that we had all been trying to land
the airplane with the least amount of vertical
drop, in other words, trying to grease the
airplane in, and we were all very successful on
that. We made landings that were of such a small
vertical descent that it was very difficult to
measure it, and still we kept coming up with
loads on the landing gear that were right of
(over) the limits. One day I was flying the
number three airplanes, and everything in the
traffic pattern was perfect. I set the airplane
up in the final attitude and didn’t have to
touch anything, and I just let the airplane land
itself. The vertical rate of descent was quite
a bit higher. We are talking about 3 or 4 feet
per second higher than we’d measured normally
and certainly not as high as we had dropped the
airplane in, but this was in the mid-range.
About 2 weeks after the flight, the structures
engineer came to me and said, “That last landing
you made we recorded the lowest for on the
structure and the landing gear that we’ve ever
measured. Now, what did you do? I said,
“Actually, it was kind of a hard landing
compared to others that we had done.”
Through analysis they learned that was the best
way to put the airplane down, not try to make it
a smooth landing but just let the airplane drop
in. What actually was happening was we would
touch the airplane down, and because of the
fulcrum, the nose would slam down, and the tail
would jump in the air. Because the struts were
already compressed, it would slam down a second
time, and all that force would then go into the
structure of the airplane, not being absorbed by
the struts. Then everybody got away from trying
to smooth the airplane in and just let it kind
of drop in the last couple of feet, and probably
saved us a lot of critical problems later on in
the program as structuresgrew older and things
like that.
I was not selected for the DynaSoar (An exo-atmospheric
airplane designed by Boeing and cancelled by
SecDef McNamara) in 1960 but Bob White, Neil
Armstrong (number one Air Force and NASA X-15
pilots) and I were. Jim Wood (A.F. test pilot)
was number one. Pete Knight (later X-15) was
selected on the program and Russ Rogers, Hank
Gordon (A.F. test pilots), Milt Thompson from
NASA, and maybe one other (Al Crews, AF test
pilot).
If there had been an acceptance for that
particular type of vehicle by the Government, we
would not have had the Mercury flights and
probably not the Gemini flights. I don’t think
all that effort with NASA on vertical launches
would have stopped completely. Had it not been
for that, yes, we would be into hypersonic
transportation right now and a horizontal launce
versus this shuttle vertical launch.
(Regarding an extremely hot aerodynamic heating
research flight he flew) We did get a higher
temperature and a higher transfer rate of
temperature within the airplane. The airplane
design (q limit) was somewhere around 2,200 lb/
sq. in. (dynamic pressure), and we actually got
a little higher on that flight than we wanted
to. We had set up an altitude and a speed to
get the temperature conditions and really didn’t
pay enough attention to the dynamic pressure
conditions tat were comparable, not realizing
they were going to be quite that high. We were
certainly well within the limit and had not
extended ourselves too far but did decide later
on that we didn’t need to go any further on
matching the dynamic pressure with other
temperature lights, so we just accepted a little
higher altitude and got the temperature but no
the dynamic pressure. We hit a maximum dynamic
pressure earlier than we needed to; we really
didn’t need to go that far.
The temperatures were very important because we
began to see early in the program we were
measuring temperatures that did not match with
the empirical data that the airplane was
designed on. As a matter of fact, there was
about a 30 percent differential between the
empirical formulas and what we were measuring,
on the safe side, which allowed us to go to
higher speeds and higher tempera
We also learned that there were other conditions
impinging on the airplane that ewe had no
knowledge of and lack of control, which would
require us to stop at basically the design
temperature, even though there was about a 30
percept safety factor in the empirical formulas
As we progressed through the program I knew Bob
White’s desires to get into a squadron commander
capacity working with TAC (Tactical Air Command)
and I knew that (Rushworth’s elevation to No1 on
X-15) shortly after he had accomplished his
high-altitude flight (over 50 miles, first
winged astronaut).
It was decided between General Branch (AFFTC
Commander), Paul Bickle (NASA Center Chief) and
myself that Joe Engle (later Shuttle Commander)
was sent forward to become the next X-15 pilot.
Joe became the next pilot, the pilot that
replaced White, and went through a very
concentrated and fast training program to get
him up to speed to be able to do that type of
flying and he did it very well. He later put in
his paper to go to the NASA effort at Houston
and was accepted for that (Space Shuttle) and
before I could leave the program he was gone. So
I then had to train another pilot, which then
was Pete Knight, who had been in the Dynasoar
program. We finally got Pete Knight up to
speed, and ten we selected Mike Adams. Once we
got him a couple of flights, then I could
leave.
After 5 or 6 flights, there were areas where you
became more comfortable, certainly the
pre-launch became a repeat…up to about, say, a
minute before launch and your anxiety level
crept up a little bit. Once you started flying
the airplane and once the drop off and the
engines started, I think all the pilots became
very comfortable in flying the airplane and
doing the work that they had to do. That was
reflected by the data that was being taken—the
pulse rate, EKG and whatnot. The anxiety level
picked back up again as we got into the traffic
pattern because that was another serious part of
the effort.
According to a December 1964 AFFTC history
report, “Test pilot Major Robert A. Rushworth
received nomination for the 1964 McKay Trophy in
recognition of hi exceptional piloting of the
newly modified X-15A-2 rocket research airplane
following an in-flight emergency on 14 August,
which developed into an extreme hazard to both
himself and the $55 million airplane.”
That speaks of the one where the nose gear came
down in flight at about Mach 5. The flight was
probably the third or fourth flight on the
airplane since it had been rebuilt and
redesigned. The airplane was reconfigured and
made about 3 feet longer to accept a hydrogen
tank that was a sphere for late on fuel for the
scramjet (supersonic combustion ramjet engine)
that we were going to carry aloft. The flight
was supposed to be at Mach 5 at about 100,000 to
110.000 feet. When I got up there, I shut off
the artificial stability systems and did a pulse
in the longitudinal axis to see how the
stability of the airplane was. In the middle of
the cycling, the nose gear came down, which
created a tremendous amount of drag, plus the
airplane without the damping system was a lot
less stable. I immediately got the dampers back
on and then had a problem and didn’t know what
it was, but I got a tremendous bang, and I
suspected that the nose hear cam out because I
could feel all the drag.
There was a lot of question in my mind and on
the ground as to whether the airplane could get
all the way back to Edwards and whether it could
be landed or whether there was any landing gear
left. Nobody knew. You couldn’t tell; it
didn’t have and indicators of whether there was
a gear down or what the problem was. I did
manage to get back to the base with a minimum
amount of altitude to make a 360 (degree
landing) pattern, and by that time Joe Engle was
in the final chase airplane and caught up to me
and said, “Yes, the nose gear is down. It looks
like it’s locked into place and stable.” I
said, “Well, it’ got to be locked into place.”
It just came down, and, of course, there was a
little pneumatic system to push it into place.
He said he couldn’t see anything bad about it,
although everybody suspected the tires and
whatnot from the heat. I cam around and made a
very tight turn because I was low in altitude
and low in speed and put the flaps down and the
skid out, and everything came out normal. We
were a little suspicious- -why did the nose gear
come down, and the skids didn’t come down-
-because they were hooked to the same cable
system. Everything fell into place and gave me
about 5 or 10 seconds there to either make a
decision to land, or if the skids didn’t com
down, I had to eject. When Joe said everything
looked good, I decided to land it.
When the nose hear hit the ground and the tires
hit the ground, I could just feel that the tires
were shredding and a lot of vibration in the
airplane for about 3 or 4 seconds, and then
there were no more tires, and it was rolling on
the steel wheels. It just smoothed out and came
to a stop eventually by the friction of the
lakebed and the skids.
As it turned out, the amount of heat that got up
into the compartment where the nose gear was
stowed burned out all of the aluminum on the
back panels and some of the wires. Of course,
it burned the tires to a point where they
wouldn’t accept the blow when it hit the ground
and the speed that it was running, so they went
flat and just threw tire everywhere. It
actually didn’t do very much damage to the
airplane. It was repaired in a very short
period of time, re-inspected all over, and new
gear installed, and we tried it again.
On the next flight, on a repeat, the nose gear
stayed in, but the left skid came down.
Actually that was a little worse flight to
control because it pulled me off line and I
couldn’t control the path of the airplane, but
finally at a slower speed I got it under
control, and we repeated the whole thing again.
That one in the landing pattern wasn’t quite as
severe. The amount of drag from one skid was
less than the nose gear.
As it turned out, the airplane, by being longer
(than before modification) stretched more when
it got hot, and the cables stretched. On the
first time, the cable that I pulled to drop the
landing hear just stretched on its own and
popped out the nose gear door and then unlocked
the landing gear, and it dropped into place.
Even though they lengthened the cable,
essentially the same thing happened when the
left main skid came down, so it was a
reengineering to get the cables the right length
to accept the stretch of the airplane when it
got hot. I think we had three landing gear
problems in those early flights of getting the
(A-2) airplane back in the air at around Mach 5.
We got ahead of that one (problem) and got the
airplane up to higher speeds and higher
altitudes and then did the flights with the
external tanks on it at even higher speeds.
Addressing AFFTC history for report, the first
flight of X-15A2 was made by Colonel Robert
Rushworth, 1 July 1966, also the first flight
with full external tanks.
The redesign of number two was done so that it
would carry external tanks and carry fuel for
scramjet engine evaluation later on. I had gone
through a couple of flights with the external
tanks captive and then launched with the tanks
empty and jettisoned those at about Mach 2, and
that was all successful, so se loaded up the
tanks, after we were convinced that everything
was going to work, with all the propellants and
took of for Mud Lake (primary dry lake for
emergency at/near launch). Everything was going
beautifully. The launch was considerably
different than with a clean airplane. The
envelope for launch was much tighter and very
close because of the added weight on the
airplane from the tanks. It started to
accelerate, and I got a call from the control
people at Edwards about 15 seconds into launch
that the one tank wasn’t feeding, then I would
get a very severe center of gravity position
because one tank was full and the other one was
partially full.
The problem that I had at the time was that our
jettison system was designed to either jettison
full or jettison empty, and we had two charges,
two buttons, and if the tanks were full, I used
the one-charge button, empty I used the 2-charge
button to get the tanks away from the airplane.
Now we were somewhere in between and had never
planned on that. When I jettisoned, I don’t
remember which button I hit, but I hit a button,
and the tanks left the airplane, and the
airplane just went through a series of porpoises
that were greater than any that we had ever
experienced. I am just surprised that the
artificial system held the airplane the way it
did. I did not shut down the engine at the time
because I just was unsure of what the situation
was going to be with the tanks and I was unsure
of whether or not I had enough speed in order to
get turned around and bet back to Mud Lake, so I
left the engine running in the normal thrust
setting and jettisoned the tanks and started by
turnaround to go to Mud Lake. When I was that I
could make the lakebed and still had enough
altitude and speed to jettison the remaining
fuel, then I shut the engine down and went into
jettison. By that time the chase airplanes
caught up, and the rest of the flight was
uneventful down onto the lakebed. As it turned
out, it was a telemetry problem, and the tanks
were feeding; actually it was in a measuring
valve, which erroneously reported no flow from
tank to airplane. They did find measuring units
that would determine the propellant was flowing.
Pete (Knight, backup pilot), and I had at least
one very good flight where he got the airplane
up to 6.7 (Mach) plus with the external tanks,
and they fed all the way out, and he jettisoned,
a good profile. But they also learned that they
couldn’t control hearting on the airplane, and
it became too hot and too dangerous to take that
airplane, even though they had ablative material
on it, to that speed safely, so they gave up on
it.
The December 1967 Flight Test Center history
noted that Major Michael J. Adams “was the
twelfth pilot to fly the Z-15 rocket research
aircraft and was killed while making his
eleventh flight 15 November 1967.”
I wasn’t there at the time, but later on,
several months after the accident, I did get to
Edwards to find out what had happened. It was a
matter of changing the configuration in the
cockpit and putting another experiment on the
airplane and the pilot not having some of the
instrumentation in the cockpit that he had been
used to having or hat we had always had in the
past. Al Mike got to the top of the trajectory,
he became more involved with the experiment part
that he was doing rather than continuing to
evaluate the trajectory, and it was in a
side-slip, quite a severe side slip, and it was
moving away from the nose correctly pointed
forward. He lost control of it going over the
top and never could get control again. Had he
been able to get even partial control he may
have been able to eject. The airplane began to
come apart, and he still could have eject, but I
was told that the canopy came off. When it came
off, it crushed his helmet, and then he lost
oxygen and lost consciousness. Up to that point
in time, if he had been in some measure of
control, he could have ejected and gotten away
safely. It was just an unfortunate set of
circumstances that happened—perhaps a little bit
of inexperience on his part or perhaps not quite
enough attention paid by the flight planners and
other people to support the kind of flight for
him at that point, the eleventh flight.
They went back to that configuration (original
instruments). The instrument was there but it
was in a different location, and it was a
different size, and he just missed the cues that
the airplane was moving.
The people who were in the X-15 program did not
consider going to the Mercury program or the
Gemini program worthwhile. It was more fun to
fly an airplane than, as we spoke of it at that
time, “ride in the can.” All of us—Kincheloe,
White, and myself—had the opportunity to aim for
the Mercury program, and we talked about I maybe
5 minutes and said, “There isn’t any way I’m
going to give up flying the X-15 for going to
ride in that can.” Since the Air Force had the
Dynasoar program on the horizon, those people
who were eligible for either the X-15 later on
or the Dynasoar had absolutely no desire to get
into the Mercury program.
It was the (later) time of the McDivitt-Collins-Joe
Engle time period those people could see that
there was no more effort on the part of the Air
Force to do this kind of flying and the only
thing that was going to be done was by NASA, so
that was the only place to go. As far as wanting
to leave the X-15 program, the only one that was
there that wanted to leave was Joe Engle.
The only two that left were Armstrong and Engle,
and Armstrong didn’t want to go: he was told to
go. He was told that they needed an experience
civilian on the program and I’m sure even at
that time there was the possibility that Neil
was going to be selected to be the first tan on
the moon, a civilian space effort. NASS was to
control all the work in space and the civilian
group that was doing it was NASA.
I stayed at Edwards so long that I knew it was
too late to get into an operational organization
and become a squadron commander and work my say
up. I might get into one of the senior service
schools (Industrial College of the Armed Forces
or National War College) and be better off. I
went to the NWC, was very fortunate to be able
to get there and enjoyed that program immensely.
I volunteered for an assignment in the Pentagon,
knowing damned good and well that I was going to
go to Vietnam. About Christmas the promotion
list came out, and I had been promoted to full
colonel. I was sent for crew training to George
Air Force Base at Victorville, CA., for about 5
months.
When I got to Cam Ranh Bay (South Vietnam) I was
assigned as assistant deputy for operations of
the 12th Fighter Wing (F-4c
aircraft). The majority of my 189 combat
missions were in South Vietnam, ordnance or
rockets or guns. I would have to guess that I
may have done 15 missions up in North Vietnam,
and they were similar. I had no air-to-air
combat. Our airplanes (F-4C) really weren’t a
good match, for anything that the Russians had,
because we had to carry the gun in the tank pod
underneath the airplane and it just slowed that
airplane down tremendously. It was used by
some, but once the E-model came out, it was a
better airplane for that as was the F-105 under
reasonable conditions.
I took hits when I didn’t even know it. On my
last flight, I got hit in the wing by the ground
fire that created a problem and had an emergency
landing. Unfortunately, I was flying the
commander’s airplane, which had just been
repainted. When “Buckshot” (Col. Floyd White)
looked at it, he said, “Why don’t you go to Hong
Kong on leave and then go home?” I was shooting
to get about 200 missions, and there was enough
time left, but “Buckshot” figured we had more
pilots than we had airplane seats and that I had
enough flying and I was going to go home within
a month anyway, so I might just as well take my
leave.
Colonel Rushworth made some observations about
the war, and attitude from his military and
combat experience.
Well, we (military do a very bad job everywhere
we go because we assume too much of the war
effort instead of letting them (indigenous
forces/allies) take the challenge. I think
every war we have been involved in that didn’t
come out right was because we tried to do it all
and we didn’t get the people involved to support
themselves. Korea was exactly the same. If we
can’t support them and get them to fight their
own battles on their terms because of whomever
they are fighting with, then it’s ridiculous for
us to go in and do the fighting for them because
when we try to give it back to them, they are
going to lose. It’s just that simple. They
can’t sustain it.
The Fiscal 1969 ASD (Aeronautical Systems
Division) history noted that “on 22 April 1969 a
new program director, Colonel R.A. Rushworth,
replaced retiring Colonel C.E. Riddle.”
I was ready to get home and back into the
business that I was more familiar with. I had
written a couple of letters to friends and asked
them for some ideas . One got to General
Townsend (B/G Guy M.) and he wrote and said he
had a good job for me.
The Walleye missile (already in service) was
primarily designed for area destruction rather
than small targets, while the Maverick was to be
smaller, less costly, and more accurate. As far
as what we, the Government, asked of it, it
performed very satisfactorily. As far as TAC
(Tactical Air Command) was concerned, the
missile had what they termed limited capability
and would have been useful only in a benign
environment. They were ready to give up on that
missile and go to a new family or a new
capability even when I was on the program. It
took considerable philosophizing with them to
make them understand that what they were asking
for was another 5-year development program, and
we could probably repeat that to infinity.
1971 ASD history noted “the most extensive
realignment in March involved the Directorate of
Flight Test, which then became the 4950th
Test Wing (Technical). Col. Rushworth’s command
of that wing was announced by him at his first
new staff meeting.
I wasn’t very pleased to pick up all those other
things that were going into that organization
that would make it a basket organization, but
that’s what L/General Stewart and L/Gen Hudson
wanted to dl. They wanted to take a lot of the
smaller non-acquisition type things off their
plate and put them somewhere where they didn’t
have to worry about them.
General Stewart called me one day and he said,
“Well, I’ve got some good news and I’ve got some
bad news. I said I’d prefer the bad news first,
but he said the good news would come first.
“The I.G. (Inspector General of Systems Command,
Andrews AFB, MD) is a good job. The bad news is
you’re leaving right away.”
There was one inspection that I thought, well,
it is going to be relatively easy. After the
inspection was over, the team leader came to me
and said, “I have got to tell that general
officer that his organization absolutely stinks,
and those are the words that I want to use.’ I
said, “Go ahead. I’ll sit right there and
listen to you, and if he growls, I’ll back you
up.” I thought it was going to be an easy
inspection, and they dug out things that you
wouldn’t believe. He told the general I said
that, and I though he was going to explode, I
could just see the blood coming up to the top of
his head, and I thought he was just going to
blow his tack right there, but he took it. He
didn’t like it, but he took it.
Well, I don’t think I got fired. General Brown
had become Air Force Chief of Staff and General
Phillips (Samuel C.) took his place (C. G.
Systems Command). Something had gone wrong at
TAWC (Tactical Air Warfare Center) and the Chief
had known B/G Howard Lane (Commander AFFTC) who
was transferred to correct the problem. I
rather suspect that when General Phillips
started looking around for someone to replace
Howard Lane, he asked the advice of probably
Lane and Stewart and Hudson, and they probably
recommended me because I had the experience (10
years at the AFFTC) and it was a logical
progression.
General Phillips said to me “I’m going to fly
out to Lane’s leaving ceremony, and I think you
had better come with me and plan to just accept
the job right then.” That was like jumping
completely out of the frying pan into the
refrigerator.
The Flight Test Center history noted that on 15
December 1974 “Brigadier General Robert A.
Rushworth, Center Commander, is nominated for
promotion to major general.”
That not only was a surprise but a complete
surprise. I think it was the first year I was
eligible for promotion. I also knew that it
meant I was going to give up the best job, which
happened unfortunately too soon.
The FTC history noted that on 23 December 1974
at 10:30 in the morning the B-1 had flown for
the first time. General Russell E. Dougherty,
SAC commander, wired congratulations to M/G
(designate) Rushworth.
The day the B-1 was scheduled to fly it came up
too windy. The winds were 30 to 35 knots, and
we just wouldn’t undertake a first flight under
those conditions. So I sat around, and I got
hold of the weatherman and said, “How long is
this going to hold?” A young fellow cane up, a
young captain, and said, “Well, I’ve been
looking at all the weather up and down the
coast. Tomorrow morning it’s going to be
absolutely calm, and by 10 o’clock in the
morning the wind is going to start blowing
again.” Everybody wondered how long he has been
here. We said, “We will reschedule for tomorrow
morning.” The next morning at 6 o’clock it was
dead calm, and at 10 o’clock the wind was
blowing again, just like he said. I don’t think
anybody ever forecasted that before. (There are
extended periods when the winds howl night and
day on the Mojave Desert.). We got the airplane
up and down and had a good flight, and then the
wind started blowing. I do remember that first
flight. There was an awful lot of effort on
everybody’s part to support it—instrumentation,
chase airplanes, radar coverage. It was a big
effort. I absolutely couldn’t believe it when
President Carter cancelled the B-1 program.
The FTC history of December 1976 reported “Major
General Thomas P. Stafford (later Lt. Gen)
became the Flight Test Center’s new commander on
4 November 1975, replacing Major General Robert
W. Robert A. Rushworth, who left Edwards for
Kirtland AFB, New Mexico, to serve as the
commander of the Air Force Test and Evaluation
Center.”
I was hopeful that I would be able to make it a
more comfortable arrangement between the Systems
Command testing and the operational center
testing, but I don’t think I did that hardly at
all. Because the organization was assigned to
the Air Force Chief of Staff, it was a good
assignment for me in that sense on a personal
basis.
The 1976 AFTEC history noted that Major General
Howard Leaf (Lt. Gen. Leaf) assumed command of
AFTEC on 1 October 1976 and Major General
Rushworth was assigned as vice commander of
Systems Command’s Aeronautical Systems Division.
I was older than all of my contemporaries by
virtue of the fact that I had been in the
service in World War II, had gotten out, and
gone through college, and those people who had
gone to West Point or the Naval Academy were
several years younger and had more tenure to
remain in the Air Force and, in that sense,
looked much more feasible as a potential
candidates than I did. I had gone past the
point where they would promote me to a permanent
major general. I told General Slay, “If you want
the assignment vacated and let somebody else
come in, I would be happy to retire at any time
but if you are not going to move me or you don’t
have any requirement to move me, I’ll stay until
about June of 1981.
I had no reservations or concerns or whatnot
about being promoted one more time. I had a
great career. I did things that nobody in the
world is ever going to do again, and I enjoyed
it. I couldn’t complain.
There were three high points of my career, I
think—when I did my altitude flight and received
my astronaut rating, when I pot promoted to
general officer, and them when I got commander
at Edwards. That really takes care of the
majority of my career. I enjoyed it all!
I was retired by Tom Marsh (Gen. Robert T.) who
was the commander at Systems Command at the
time. The ceremony was just outside the Air
Force Museum out at the end of the building, and
whoever set it up did a super job. They dragged
the X-15 out, and put it right in front of the
reviewing stand on the other side of the parade
ground. The setting was kind of historic. I
could look out and see a whole bunch of
airplanes that I had flown, and I could see a
lot of airplanes that I didn’t fly, but most of
the significant airplanes that I flew were all
out in the field. It was a pretty good day.
My mother was there: she lived with me at the
time, but my daughter (Cheri) was about 7 or 8
months pregnant and could not make it. But my
son-in-law (Terry) flew up, with a friend, both
stationed at Reese Air Force Base, Texas.
I did find a position as a director with a
company. It’s a small civilian organization—the
name is Searson Research Corporation. Primarily
it’s coating windshields, canopies, glass,
polyesters, polycarbonates, etc., on classified
contracts with the Government. I am one of
three managing directors. We meet monthly and
go over the business and activities. I consult
also and one doesn’t interfere with the other.
Wherein I used to work 6 or 6 ½ days a week and
the play golf 1 day, I have flipped that around
now that I play golf 6 days a week and work 1
day. |